INEC’s Swift Handling of Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan’s Recall Petition Raises Eyebrows

The Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) has come under scrutiny following its rapid processing of a petition to recall Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan, representing Kogi Central Senatorial District. The petition, purportedly signed by over 250,000 constituents, was submitted and acknowledged by INEC within an eight-hour window—a stark contrast to the commission’s typical timeline for updating and validating voter registers, which usually spans six to twelve months.

The Recall Petition: A Rapid Development

On March 25, 2025, a group identified as Concerned Kogi Youth and Women submitted a petition to INEC’s headquarters in Abuja, seeking the recall of Senator Akpoti-Uduaghan. The petitioners claimed to have gathered signatures from more than half of the 474,554 registered voters in the senatorial district. The petition was received by INEC Secretary, Rose Oriaran-Anthony, who assured that the commission would act in accordance with legal provisions. citeturn0search0

INEC’s Initial Response and Subsequent Reversal

Initially, INEC identified significant deficiencies in the petition, notably the absence of contact details for the petitioners, which are essential for verification purposes. INEC’s Director of Voter Education and Publicity, Victor Aluko, emphasized that the commission could not proceed with the recall process without complete information. citeturn0search7

However, in a surprising turn, INEC later announced that the petition now met all necessary requirements, suggesting that the previously missing contact details had been provided. This rapid resolution has raised questions about the commission’s internal processes and the influence of external pressures.

Discrepancies in Voter Engagement

The recall initiative has highlighted notable inconsistencies in voter engagement within Kogi Central. Despite only 106,000 individuals participating in the last election, the petitioners claim to have secured over 250,000 signatures for the recall—a figure that exceeds the total number of votes cast in the previous poll. This disparity has led to skepticism regarding the authenticity and motivation behind the recall effort. citeturn0search12

Senator Akpoti-Uduaghan’s Position

Senator Akpoti-Uduaghan has expressed strong reservations about the legitimacy of the recall petition. She contends that the process is politically motivated and lacks genuine constituent support. The senator has called on INEC to uphold its integrity by ensuring that due process is followed meticulously. citeturn0search1

Public and Legal Reactions

The expedited handling of the recall petition has elicited reactions from various stakeholders. Legal experts and civil society organizations have voiced concerns over INEC’s ability to maintain impartiality and consistency in its operations. The apparent ease with which the petition met the necessary criteria, juxtaposed with the prolonged timelines typically associated with voter register updates, has led to calls for a comprehensive review of INEC’s procedures.

Conclusion

The unfolding events surrounding Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan’s recall petition have cast a spotlight on INEC’s operational protocols and raised pertinent questions about the commission’s consistency and susceptibility to external influences. As the situation develops, it remains imperative for INEC to demonstrate unwavering commitment to transparency, fairness, and adherence to legal frameworks to maintain public confidence in Nigeria’s electoral processes.

navlistControversy Surrounds INEC’s Handling of Senator Akpoti-Uduaghan’s Recallturn0search0,turn0search1,turn0search12